![]() ![]() The defense says the questioning prompted the children to come up with untrue and fantastic accounts of abuse. When initially questioned, the boys said no abuse occurred, the defense says, but over time, their accounts changed and they made numerous allegations. Or they grow confidence and tell the truth know shameful feelingĪnd that if questioned repeatedly, they can develop false accounts based on questions they are asked. It is shameful and they were under threat by the pedo. University of Toledo Associate Professor Kamala London, who testified for the defense, says the first response children make is usually the most accurate They also say that leading and suggestive questions can result in inaccurate accounts of abuse. International experts say such treatment is inappropriate in children’s cases because it can be traumatic in itself. It is in their interest to say such thing. Lets give benefit of doubt that parents ALWAYS want the best for their children, shall we? The boys, about 5 when the alleged abuse occurred, were questioned repeatedly by parents, psychologists and police and were given multiple, sometimes painful, medical exams,Īll the above is necessary. The Children – The central evidence against the defendants is the testimony of three boys who say they were sexually abused. Writer already conclude who is right and who is wrong. This blog (it is just a blog, even though hosted by wsj) is misleading and too leaning to one side. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |